Air quality involves many components, including ventilation, temperature, relative humidity and air contaminants. Ventilation systems used to control air quality can be achieved through the introduction of large quantities of air (dilution ventilation) or at the source where the contaminants are generated (local exhaust). Ventilation requirements during construction, renovation and building maintenance are also critical in ensuring the health of employees and occupants and may require specialized equipment to mitigate air quality problems.
The American Conference of Governmental Industrial Hygienists (ACGIH) publishes a list of substances each year for which they have set new or revised threshold limit values (TLV). You can contact ACGIH to obtain the publication at the ACGIH website.
You will need to create a profile, and then request a PDF copy of the 2016 TLVs & BEIs. Once a profile is created, you can email customerservice@acgih.org. There is a fee of $25 USD per copy or per person using them.
Yes, although mechanical ventilation systems are preferred, natural ventilation can be acceptable if the concentration of air contaminants, ambient temperature and relative humidity do not exceed levels stipulated in ANSI/ASHRAE standard 62.1-2010 Ventilation for Acceptable Indoor Air Quality or a standard offering equivalent or better protection. Air Quality (worksafenb.ca)
When mobile equipment powered by internal combustion engines are operated indoors or in an enclosed place of employment
For more information see: Industrial Lift Trucks (CCOHS) and Indoor Use of Propane-powered Forklifts.
An “occupational exposure limit” means
TLVs is a registered trademark of the ACGIH (American Conference of Governmental Industrial Hygienists). Since the Committee recommended exceptions to the 2016 and 1997 TLVs, the term “threshold limit value” cannot legally be used for these exceptions. Hence a new definition for “occupational exposure limit” which replaces the need for a definition of “threshold limit value”.
Refer to the 2016 Threshold Limit Values for Chemical Substances and Physical Agents and Biological Exposure Indices to see if exposure level for substance in your workplace changed.
WorkSafeNB has not yet set any additional exposure limits. If a hazardous air contaminant is identified that does not have an occupational exposure limit, then WorkSafeNB may set limits. The new OEL of this air contaminant and pertaining information would then be shared with the public on our website.
The American Society of Heating, Refrigerating and Air Conditioning Engineers (ASHRAE) standards cited in General Regulation 91-191 excludes health care facilities. The Canadian Standards Association (CSA) governs the requirements for health care facilities which require more stringent ventilation requirements.
No. This legislation only applies to powered mobile equipment manufactured after April 1, 2024.
A hazard may not be readily apparent because the substance is not detectable by taste, smell, or other (non-harmful) ways. Examples include CO and oxygen deficiency and H2S for some individuals. This would also include substances which OEL is lower than the smell threshold (isocyanates for instance).
If it is part of the workplace process for the powered mobile equipment to go into an enclosed place of employment, then the law applies, even if the regularity is once a week, once a month, etc. If it is an extraordinary circumstance, such as an emergency or a “one off” occasion, then the law would not be applicable.
Often, values for applicable alternative exposure limits can be found in the safety data sheet of the product. If the information cannot be found, then you can refer to another acceptable alternative exposure limits such as:
The extent of the work area assessment required will depend on the circumstances of each workplace. In most cases actual regular measurement of air contaminants or an indicator of them will be necessary.
Measurement of the air contaminant levels may not be needed in circumstances where contaminant levels measured are minimal and exhaust emission controls have been provided, an effective service maintenance program is in place, and workplace ventilation rates are adequate. If at any time the workplace assessment suggests workers may be exposed to levels above the applicable exposure limit, then equipment operation should be suspended until additional controls are provided.
Preliminary assessment
In most cases, a preliminary assessment to determine the general suitability of equipment should be conducted before the equipment is put into operation. An additional air contaminant assessment may also be required, depending on the results of the preliminary assessment.
The preliminary assessment should consider factors such as
Air contaminant assessment
Some guidance is provided below on the circumstances in which an additional air contaminant assessment is needed.
The initial air testing should be conducted under the conditions in the workplace that are expected to result in the highest exposure levels. If air contaminant levels under these "worst case" conditions are well within the applicable exposure limits (meets with the low exposure level criteria described below), then additional air testing would not likely be required.
Exposure levels are defined as follows:
Gasoline/propane/natural gas
For engines not equipped with emission controls, carbon monoxide (CO) can generally be used as a good indicator of overall exposure levels. However, even if CO levels are low, nitrogen dioxide (NO2) exposure levels will also need to be evaluated, particularly if the engine is equipped with a catalytic converter (which reduces CO and HC).
Depending on the level of exposure, the suggested frequency for air contaminant assessment is as follows:
Special cases:
Diesel
Although evaluating worker exposure to air contaminants generated by diesel engines tends to be more challenging than with other common fuel types, due to the number of potential air contaminants, diesel exhaust emissions are usually more visible. For example, they contain over 10 times more particulate matter or smoke than gasoline engine emissions. In addition, they are more directly irritating. As such, a more subjective evaluation can also prove useful as a workplace exposure assessment tool.
As a minimum, exposure evaluation will need to include CO and NO2. However, since diesel exhaust generally contains relatively low levels of carbon monoxide, CO alone cannot be used as a reliable indicator of exposure. Nitrogen dioxide (NO2) is a principal concern, but contaminants such as aldehydes and diesel particulate matter may also be significant.
For certain applications, such as where heavy duty or larger diesel engines are being operated, carbon dioxide (CO2) may also be used as an indicator of contaminant levels. For example, where CO2 levels are less than about 1,000 ppm and subjective criteria (smoke, haze, irritations) have also been acceptable, then all contaminant levels associated with diesel exhaust are likely within acceptable limits.
The following table summarizes how CO2 levels and/or a combination of CO and NO2 readings could be used to assess the potential for worker exposure to harmful levels of diesel exhaust components. (The table is adapted from Control of Diesel Exhaust Emissions in the Workplace, Health & Safety Executive, U.K.)
Table: Exposure levels and emission controls
Low |
Medium |
High |
No visible haze in the workplace |
Occasional white, blue, or black smoke visible in the workplace |
Permanent white, blue, or black smoke |
No visible soot deposits |
Soot deposits visible |
Heavy soot deposits especially near emission points |
No complaints or reports of irritancy or other ill effects |
A few complaints of irritancy or other ill effects |
Worker complaints widespread |
CO2 levels less than 800 ppm and/or CO <8 ppm and NO2 levels less than 50% of the exposure limit of 3ppm |
CO2 levels near 800 ppm and/or CO levels approaching 10 ppm or NO2 levels approaching the exposure limit |
CO2 levels in excess of 1000 ppm and/or CO levels in excess of 10 ppm or NO2 levels above the exposure limit |
Controls likely to be adequate - periodic re-evaluation |
Controls may not be adequate. Additional assessment for other contaminants will likely be required or additional controls |
Controls not likely adequate. Immediately cease operations and decide on new control strategy before resuming. Re-evaluation required |
For an answer to this question, please review the CCOHS site “7-Installation and Maintenance (General)” which can be found at https://www.ccohs.ca/oshanswers/prevention/ventilation/installation.html
First determine if the dust is combustible. Refer to information provided by WorkSafeBC.
For dust collectors with a volume of 0.6 m3: the dust collector must be located or constructed to ensure that in the event of an explosion, employees are not in danger. For information on combustible dust, please visit WorkSafeBC.
For information on Combustible Wood Dust please see the safety topic at WorkSafeNB | Combustible wood dust and also information at Wood Dust - Health Effects : OSH Answers (ccohs.ca)
If you have a wood dust collector with a volume of 0.6 m3 that could endanger employees, then you are required to retrofit the dust collector on or before April 1, 2024.
Good Engineering Practices (GEPs) consist of proven and accepted engineering methods, procedures and practices that provide appropriate, cost-effective, and well documented solutions to meet user requirements and compliance with applicable regulations. (ISPE Good Practice Guide: Good Engineering Practice book published in December 2008)
Note: A useful guide is Industrial Ventilation -- A Manual of Recommended Practice published by the ACGIH.
Measuring carbon dioxide (CO2) levels can be a useful tool to judge effectiveness of ventilation systems, both natural and mechanical. When CO2 is used as a surrogate indicator, analysis of indoor CO2 concentrations can lead to a better understanding of the performance of a ventilation system and the fresh air intake into the space.
CO2 is an easy to measure agent and instantaneous measurements can be taken throughout the day. Humans exhale CO2 with every breath. Thus, as occupants enter an indoor space, CO2 levels inside that space will increase, and so will other occupant-derived pollutant concentrations (bioeffluents) and odours. As ventilation systems introduce fresh air into the space, exhaled CO2, as well as other air contaminants, will be displaced. Therefore, we can judge if the amount of fresh air introduced into a space is sufficient by measuring the resulting CO2 levels.
The ASHRAE standard 62.1 currently cited in General Regulation 191-91 recommends maintaining indoor CO2 levels at no greater than 700 ppm above outdoor air levels which are typically at or below 500 ppm. Therefore, ventilation that maintains peak CO2 concentrations below 1,200 ppm throughout the day would be considered efficient.*
Please note: Carbon dioxide concentration in indoor air is only one of several factors to consider when assessing indoor air quality or when judging acceptability of ventilation systems. Gen. Reg. 191-91 requires non-healthcare facilities to be adequately ventilated by mechanical ventilation conforming to ANSI/ASHRAE standard 62.1-2010 “Ventilation for Acceptable Indoor Air Quality” and allows the use of natural ventilation only if mechanical ventilation is not practical and if the concentration of air contaminants, ambient temperature and relative humidity do not exceed levels as stipulated in the same ASHRAE standard. Please refer to ASHRAE standard 62.1-2010 for further information.
*This advice might be varied for certain work environments, such as educational facilities, and is not applicable to others, such as beauty and nail salons, disco/dance floors, health care facilities, or health clubs. Work environments requiring a fresh outdoor air rate higher than 15 cfm/person per ASHRAE standard 62.1-2010 can not rely on indoor CO2 level measurements to judge adequacy of ventilation. Please refer to the standard for further information or contact prevention@ws-ts.nb.ca.